On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 08:55:05AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (26/11/15 16:51), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 04:46:07PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 03:47:13PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:53:46AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > I'm resending a patch for ticket #2870 on behalf of the original > >> > > reporter who also kindly submitted a patch. > >> > > > >> > > The patch looks good to me, as soon as we fix CI, I'll submit it as > >> > > well > >> > > and I think we can push it.. > >> > > >> > > From 79e3fe4052b0bdb0ca6b9c62686cacb581df0044 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> > > From: Mathieu Deaudelin-Lemay <cont...@mdeaudelin.net> > >> > > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:56:11 -0500 > >> > > Subject: [PATCH] Changes to allow SSSD to be used for access control > >> > > with a > >> > > machine account belonging to a domain controller. > >> > > >> > CI passed: > >> > http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/33/92/summary.html > >> > > >> > Conceptually the patch was already agreen on by Simo in the ticket. The > >> > code looks good to me as well, so if there is no opposition, I'll push > >> > it. > >> > >> I checked that the value of UAC_SERVER_TRUST_ACCOUNT is the right one. > >> Since you already run the CI I'd say ACK. > >> > >> bye, > >> Sumit > > > >Thank you for checking, pushed with your RB: > > 5c129880ae10c80b4f79cb2994e9d127dc6dfbef > Is there a reason why this patch could not be in stable branch? > Timo asked it on #sssd.
No, just push it. _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
