On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 04:08:03PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > So, sorry for the very long title and please, see the proposed patches > for solving https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3094 > > > Best Regards, > -- > Fabiano Fidêncio
> From 7b04832fce0bdf7f8e86c30f60811f7d219e62fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabiano=20Fid=C3=AAncio?= <fiden...@redhat.com> > Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:04:51 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] RESPONDERS: Decrease debug level for failures in ACK > From ac7d4a7e6dfaf5d6c08419452b36937ac01453be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabiano=20Fid=C3=AAncio?= <fiden...@redhat.com> > Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:08:09 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 2/3] RESPONDERS: Show a bit more info in case of ACK > From 8d595daa03b2a8af1605744cd19d5000a9546456 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabiano=20Fid=C3=AAncio?= <fiden...@redhat.com> > Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:12:45 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] RESPONDERS: Pass errno to strerror() when > SELINUX_getpeercon() fails I would prefer: ret = errno; strerror(ret) in case we ever added another IO operation into the block which might reset errno. _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org