On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 04:08:03PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> So, sorry for the very long title and please, see the proposed patches
> for solving https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3094
>
>
> Best Regards,
> --
> Fabiano Fidêncio
> From 7b04832fce0bdf7f8e86c30f60811f7d219e62fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabiano=20Fid=C3=AAncio?= <fiden...@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:04:51 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] RESPONDERS: Decrease debug level for failures in
ACK
> From ac7d4a7e6dfaf5d6c08419452b36937ac01453be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabiano=20Fid=C3=AAncio?= <fiden...@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:08:09 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] RESPONDERS: Show a bit more info in case of
ACK
> From 8d595daa03b2a8af1605744cd19d5000a9546456 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabiano=20Fid=C3=AAncio?= <fiden...@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:12:45 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] RESPONDERS: Pass errno to strerror() when
> SELINUX_getpeercon() fails
I would prefer:
ret = errno;
strerror(ret)
in case we ever added another IO operation into the block which might
reset errno.
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
