On (09/08/16 10:50), Pavel Březina wrote: >On 08/09/2016 10:47 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (09/08/16 10:35), Pavel Březina wrote: >> > On 07/20/2016 11:10 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: >> > > CI: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/50/01/summary.html >> > > >> > > The failure is about missing dependencies, unrelated to these patches. >> > > >> > > It depends on the sssctl failover patches due to changes in attaching >> > > dbus message to a talloc context. Now it is possible to also free the >> > > message with both dbus_message_unref() and talloc_free(). Since the >> > > sssctl patches are already in late review process I didn't want to >> > > change them. >> > >> > Bump. >> I had a plan to test these patches >> but there are still some regressions in sssd >> and I would like to avoid introducing new ones without testing. >> >> Do these patches block you or other patches? >> >> LS > >I would like to build on top of those patches further improvements to sssctl, >such as talloc memory report. That said, I'd like to get them reviewed sooner >that later, it doesn't need to be pushed though. OK, I will try to run tests as soon as possible
LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
