On (19/08/16 09:38), Simo Sorce wrote: >On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 11:20 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (19/08/16 10:41), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:39:27AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> >> On (19/08/16 10:25), sssd-github-notificat...@fedorahosted.org wrote: >> >> >jhrozek's pull request #5: "Miscellanous patches for the sssd-secrets >> >> >responder" was opened >> >> > >> >> >PR body: >> >> >The first patch just makes an internal function static. The other just >> >> >makes the use of a config section more uniform. We could go one way or >> >> >the other, I don't really mind which, but we shouldn't use two ways to >> >> >access the same data. >> >> > >> >> >See the full pull-request at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5 >> >> >> >> Would it be possible to sent patches in mail? >> >> samba does it. It would be a hint for me wheter it worth >> >> to review a patch in web interface. >> > >> >It's possible, but not implemented. I would like to send a separate mail >> >about the proposed workflow anyway. >> Then please attach mails to the thread :-) > >+1 > Simo, I thought it would be for you to see patches from github. So you needn't watch every PR in GH but I didn't want to be your spokesman :-)
LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
