On (30/08/16 21:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:51:43PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (30/08/16 13:01), Pavel Březina wrote: >> >On 08/19/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I'm sending this patch on behalf of Nalin, who attached it to >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063278#c9 >> > >> >Ack. >> > >> >Solves: >> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1498 >> Denis wrote a comment into BZ >> >> in quick testing it works. fall back is very slow, but it does appear >> to do so. >> >> Current version iterate over all addressed and we can contine with next one >> only if the 1st failed. >> >> Could we try to connect to all addressed at once and use the fastest >> (pool should use the fastest connection) > >Feel free to write a patch. I think Nalin's patch is already an >improvement over total breakage we have now. The question is what is better.
The broken version or *very slow* version. IMHO broken version. LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
