URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/165 Title: #165: selinux: Do not fail if SELinux is not managed
lslebodn commented: """ On (23/02/17 00:40), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:20:08AM -0800, mzidek-rh wrote: >> Previously we failed if selinux_is_managed returned >> 0 or -1 (not managed or error). With this patch we >> only fail in case of error and continue normally if >> selinux is not managed by libsemanage at all. >> >> Resolves: >> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3297 >> You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: >> >> https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/165 > >So far I only scrolled through the diff, but it looks OK. Did you try >building the package for @adelton to see if it fixes the issue he was >seeing? > Firstly we need to ensure that we do not break selinux integration. Then we can check use case with disabled SELinux. LS """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/165#issuecomment-281942899
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
