URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/246 Title: #246: filter_users and filter_groups stop working properly in v 1.15
fidencio commented: """ On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Pavel Březina <notificati...@github.com> wrote: > What do we want to do in this case? It would fail with EINVAL later on > when filling the grent/pwent anyways, no? > > That comment should said ENOMEM. If name is NULL, sss_output_name will > return NULL and we fail with ENOMEM. > But there's no memory involved at all on sss_get_name_from_msg(). I'll follow you suggestion and update the PR anyways. > And last comment ... the introduced functions are not dealing with > cache_req_result at all. What they do is changing the ldb_result and moving > this part of the code to the cache_req_result.c does seem a little bit > weird to me. > > But it still deals in some sort of result that is used but cache_reqso I > think it is ok. It deserves to be placed in separate function at least, > doesn't matter if static or incache_req_result.c`. > Okay, I'm going for a new static function cache_req_search() then. > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/246#issuecomment-297654116>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAG4emnmFcpvUfLeSxW9MXXs76I3ZC1Zks5r0FeFgaJpZM4NGkQK> > . > Thanks for the review! """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/246#issuecomment-297655912
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org