> On 8 Aug 2017, at 16:51, Fabiano Fidêncio <fiden...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> People,
>
> There's a test, part of our internal CI, recurrently failing in the
> past few weeks:
>
> =================================== FAILURES
> ===================================
> _____________________________ test_add_remove_user
> _____________________________
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
> "/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/ci/label/debian_testing/src/tests/intg/test_enumeration.py",
> line 418, in test_add_remove_user
> ent.assert_passwd(ent.contains_only())
> File
> "/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/ci/label/debian_testing/src/tests/intg/ent.py",
> line 345, in assert_passwd
> assert not d, d
> AssertionError: list mismatch:
> unexpected users found:
> [{'dir': '/home/user',
> 'gecos': '2001',
> 'gid': 2000,
> 'name': 'user',
> 'passwd': '*',
> 'shell': '/bin/bash',
> 'uid': 2001}]
> ==================== 1 failed, 226 passed in 976.19 seconds
> ====================
>
> There's already an open issue for this case:
> https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3463 in order to track the issue.
>
> So, as the subject says, shall we officially stop pushing patches till
> we have this issue solved?
>
I personally think pushing your workaround patch (that essentially just
increases wait time) is good enough to unblock the development now and we
should keep making the fix cleaner at the same time.
But in general I agree that a test that is consistently failing should be
inspected asap..
> Best Regards,
> --
> Fabiano Fidêncio
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
