URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/529 Title: #529: SPEC: Move secrets responder to the package sssd-kcm
jhrozek commented: """ I understand the point about minimal dependencies of sssd-common, but I wonder if it was better to create a separate subpackage for the secrets binary. This is for two reasons, a) the proposed packaging is not intuitive, b) we are actually thinking about not talking to the secrets REST API from KCM to secrets, but writing to the secrets database directly. And then bundling the two responders together wouldn't make sense. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/529#issuecomment-372444317
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
