On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 16:08 +0100, Debarshi Ray wrote: > Hey, > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 7:26 PM Robbie Harwood <rharw...@redhat.com> wrote: > > CCing some GOA folks. I believe their preference was for the inotify > > approach. > > > > Moreover, I'd like to provide a consistent interface to all of the > > ccaches from krb5. I'm not going to be able to do that if dbus becomes > > involved (for a variety of reasons). > > The GOA code monitoring Kerberos credentials caches is already custom > made for each different cache type. > > So far it has only been inotify for FILE and DIR caches, but we are > currently working on adding notification support for KEYRING caches > based on David Howell's ongoing kernel work. See: > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-online-accounts/-/merge_requests/47
I am worried it will take longer still: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/15/1030 BNu twho knows, Linus can change mind quickly. > I don't particularly expect D-Bus signals for KCM caches. If it's > D-Bus, then we will add another code path for KCM, if it's something > else, we will try to fit it in as best as we can. > > Of course, a unified libkrb5 API would be really nice. My personal comments were going in this direction, however I do not have a strong preference and if there is consistent investment that we want to preserve I won't complain. Simo. -- Simo Sorce RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
