URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5300
Title: #5300: ad: use parallel cldap ping for site discovery

sumit-bose commented:
"""
Hi,

thanks for the patches. My tests with various configurations with multiple 
existing, not-existing or not responding DCs went well. Coverity didn't had 
anything to complain either.

While reading the patches I was wondering if it would make sense to create a 
macro for `"cldap"` since the string is used in a comparison? What do you 
think? This can be extended of course to the `"ldap"`, `"ldaps"` and `"ldapi"` 
strings when used to indicate an LDAP schema. Since this won't improve the 
readability I'm fine with keeping it as it is.

bye,
Sumit
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5300#issuecomment-698259812
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to