On (07/05/14 10:13), Timo Aaltonen wrote: >On 07.05.2014 10:07, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (07/05/14 09:59), Timo Aaltonen wrote: >>> On 02.05.2014 12:15, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>>> On (02/05/14 11:03), Paul Liljenberg wrote: >>>>> Unfortuneately im tied to current debian stable in this setup and >>>>> backporting sssd does not seem possible. Thanx Steve. >>>>> >>>> I asked debian maintaner of sssd(Timo). Whether it would be possible to >>>> have sssd-1.9.6 in wheezy-backports. >>>> >>>> 11:09 < lslebodn> tjaalton: Will it be possible to have sssd-1.9 in wheezy >>>> (wheezy-backport)? >>>> 11:25 < tjaalton> lslebodn: maybe >>>> >>>> Paul, you can try to persuade him to do it :-) >>>> I added Timo to CC. >>> >>> yes, I'm aware of this request.. have a chroot ready for build tests, >>> trying to figure out which packaging branch to use as the base, since >>> 1.9.x never got in Debian.. >> 1.9 is the last branch which can be build without samba4 (samba-dev) >> and I was not able to find samba-dev in wheezy >> https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=wheezy&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=samba-dev > >right, I'll just use the 1.8.x packaging and some fixes cherry-picked > If you want I have a "Work in progres patch" which disable ipa and ad provider in 1.11 branch and thus 1.11 branch can be compiled without samba4
LS _______________________________________________ sssd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
