On (03/11/17 08:53), Lachlan Musicman wrote: >On 3 November 2017 at 08:19, Lukas Slebodnik <lsleb...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On (02/11/17 08:20), Lachlan Musicman wrote: >> >Last night sssd shutdown on one of my servers. >> > >> >I had updated the IPA server earlier in the day - but only patches to >> >4.5.0, nothing major. >> > >> >The error I saw this AM was: >> > >> > >> >(Wed Nov 1 17:08:22 2017) [sssd[be[unix.domain.com]]] [orderly_shutdown] >> >(0x0010): SIGTERM: killing >> >children >> >(Wed Nov 1 17:08:50 2017) [sssd[be[unix.domain.com]]] >> >[sysdb_domain_cache_connect] (0x0010): DB version too old [0.18], expected >> >[0.19] for domain unix.domain.com! >> >> sysdb version 0.19 is only in sssd-1.16.0 which is not in el7.4 by default. >> > > >Ah! > >And we are using the SSSD 1.16.0 from COPR. > >Hmm. What should we do? All of our servers are using sssd from the COPR >repo and our IPA server is using the CentOS repos for ipa-*. >
sssd cache should be upgraded after restart. I have no idea how it is possible that new binaries are used and sssd cache is old. In theory, there is an explanation that sssd was not restarted and backend(sssd_be was restarted) and thus new version of binary was used. Another explanation is that upgrade for some reason failed. But in this case I would expect that sssd should not run. It would be good if you could provide more details or even reproducer :-) LS _______________________________________________ sssd-users mailing list -- sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
