On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 07:46:55PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > please try to add the following patch and then to build SSSD again: > > > > > > diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am > > > index 9539b3c..8e76a03 100644 > > > --- a/Makefile.am > > > +++ b/Makefile.am > > > @@ -975,6 +975,7 @@ libsss_cert_la_LIBADD = \ > > > $(TALLOC_LIBS) \ > > > $(TEVENT_LIBS) \ > > > libsss_crypt.la \ > > > + libsss_child.la \ > > > libsss_debug.la \ > > > libsss_certmap.la \ > > > $(NULL) > > > > > > > Builds for me. > > Thanks for testing and the feedback. > > > Will there be a new release now? if not, can you mail a "proper" patch ? > > I will send a pull request to github with the patch.
Can you also file a ticket, please? > Since I originally > had issues reproducing the error I just wanted to know if it really works > in other environments as well. Releasing a new tarball with minimal changes is not a lot of work, but also does not come totally for free..maybe a couple of hours. But I would like to ask if the compilationa and linker options that break the build for you are the default for your distribution? Because if sssd doesn't build with the default flags some distributions use (especially a major ones like suse..) then maybe we should do a release. Otherwise I hope all packaging systems allow for some way of adding a patch. btw the Jenkins CI instance that we run internally at Red Hat tests every commit on Fedora, RHEL and Debian. The github PRs also run CI on CentOS...so we /do/ test builds on multiple distributions, but not all of them.. _______________________________________________ sssd-users mailing list -- sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org/message/X7WOOKBCPXIYFUWFKMBEMODL63PJ6SYN/
