From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> commit 65cc8e4859ff29a9ddc989c88557d6059834c2a2 upstream.
Now that we hold the rq->lock over set_task_cpu() again, we can do away with most of the TASK_WAKING checks and reduce them again to set_cpus_allowed_ptr(). Removes some conditionals from scheduling hot-paths. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]> --- kernel/sched.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 31b0bae..e542c1e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -914,8 +914,8 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) #endif /* __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW */ /* - * Check whether the task is waking, we use this to synchronize against - * ttwu() so that task_cpu() reports a stable number. + * Check whether the task is waking, we use this to synchronize ->cpus_allowed + * against ttwu(). */ static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) { @@ -932,11 +932,9 @@ static inline struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p) struct rq *rq; for (;;) { - while (task_is_waking(p)) - cpu_relax(); rq = task_rq(p); raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_is_waking(p))) + if (likely(rq == task_rq(p))) return rq; raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); } @@ -953,12 +951,10 @@ static struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags) struct rq *rq; for (;;) { - while (task_is_waking(p)) - cpu_relax(); local_irq_save(*flags); rq = task_rq(p); raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_is_waking(p))) + if (likely(rq == task_rq(p))) return rq; raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, *flags); } @@ -5341,7 +5337,18 @@ int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask) struct rq *rq; int ret = 0; + /* + * Serialize against TASK_WAKING so that ttwu() and wunt() can + * drop the rq->lock and still rely on ->cpus_allowed. + */ +again: + while (task_is_waking(p)) + cpu_relax(); rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); + if (task_is_waking(p)) { + task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags); + goto again; + } if (!cpumask_intersects(new_mask, cpu_active_mask)) { ret = -EINVAL; -- 1.7.3.3 _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
