From: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>

commit d900329e20f4476db6461752accebcf7935a8055 upstream.

After uncapping the CPUID level, we need to also re-run the CPU
feature detection code.

This resolves kernel bugzilla 16322.

Reported-by: boris64 <[email protected]>
LKML-Reference: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h    |    1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c  |    1 +
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 4868e4a..c4329af 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ void __cpuinit cpu_detect(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
        }
 }
 
-static void __cpuinit get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+void __cpuinit get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
        u32 tfms, xlvl;
        u32 ebx;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
index 3624e8a..f668bb1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
@@ -33,5 +33,6 @@ extern const struct cpu_dev *const __x86_cpu_dev_start[],
                            *const __x86_cpu_dev_end[];
 
 extern void cpu_detect_cache_sizes(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
+extern void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 1366c7c..e546d54 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
                        misc_enable &= ~MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_LIMIT_CPUID;
                        wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE, misc_enable);
                        c->cpuid_level = cpuid_eax(0);
+                       get_cpu_cap(c);
                }
        }
 
-- 
1.7.3.3

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to