> The mask indicates the bits one wants to zero out, so it needs to be
> inverted before applying to the original TOS field.

Uhm, does it?
This is backwards incompatible...

To me, you always 'and' with a mask, not with the negation of the mask.
ie. a mask is the bits you want to keep.

(mind you I haven't looked at the documentation of the feature, but
I'm still pretty sure the right fix here is to change the docs, not
the functionality)

> The following Linux kernels are affected: <= 2.6.38.8

- Maciej

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to