On 11-04-13 11:51 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> 2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us 
> know.

This introduces new compile warnings, albeit reasonably harmless ones:

net/ipv4/inet_diag.c: In function ‘inet_csk_diag_dump’:
net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:496:10: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘nlmsg_find_attr’ 
discards qualifiers from pointer target type
include/net/netlink.h:387:30: note: expected ‘struct nlmsghdr *’ but argument 
is of type ‘const struct nlmsghdr *’

and more instances of the same.  Grabbing the following commit in
conjunction with this existing one fixes it to be quiet again.

commit 6b8c92ba07287578718335ce409de8e8d7217e40
Author: Nelson Elhage <[email protected]>
Date:   Wed Nov 3 16:35:40 2010 +0000

    netlink: Make nlmsg_find_attr take a const nlmsghdr*.
    
    This will let us use it on a nlmsghdr stored inside a netlink_callback.
    
    Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <[email protected]>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Paul.


> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Nelson Elhage <[email protected]>
> 
> commit 22e76c849d505d87c5ecf3d3e6742a65f0ff4860 upstream.
> 
> We were using nlmsg_find_attr() to look up the bytecode by attribute when
> auditing, but then just using the first attribute when actually running
> bytecode. So, if we received a message with two attribute elements, where only
> the second had type INET_DIAG_REQ_BYTECODE, we would validate and run 
> different
> bytecode strings.
> 
> Fix this by consistently using nlmsg_find_attr everywhere.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
> [jmm: Slightly adapted to apply against 2.6.32]
> Cc: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> ---
>  net/ipv4/inet_diag.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
> @@ -489,9 +489,11 @@ static int inet_csk_diag_dump(struct soc
>  {
>       struct inet_diag_req *r = NLMSG_DATA(cb->nlh);
>  
> -     if (cb->nlh->nlmsg_len > 4 + NLMSG_SPACE(sizeof(*r))) {
> +     if (nlmsg_attrlen(cb->nlh, sizeof(*r))) {
>               struct inet_diag_entry entry;
> -             struct rtattr *bc = (struct rtattr *)(r + 1);
> +             const struct nlattr *bc = nlmsg_find_attr(cb->nlh,
> +                                                       sizeof(*r),
> +                                                       
> INET_DIAG_REQ_BYTECODE);
>               struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
>  
>               entry.family = sk->sk_family;
> @@ -511,7 +513,7 @@ static int inet_csk_diag_dump(struct soc
>               entry.dport = ntohs(inet->dport);
>               entry.userlocks = sk->sk_userlocks;
>  
> -             if (!inet_diag_bc_run(RTA_DATA(bc), RTA_PAYLOAD(bc), &entry))
> +             if (!inet_diag_bc_run(nla_data(bc), nla_len(bc), &entry))
>                       return 0;
>       }
>  
> @@ -526,9 +528,11 @@ static int inet_twsk_diag_dump(struct in
>  {
>       struct inet_diag_req *r = NLMSG_DATA(cb->nlh);
>  
> -     if (cb->nlh->nlmsg_len > 4 + NLMSG_SPACE(sizeof(*r))) {
> +     if (nlmsg_attrlen(cb->nlh, sizeof(*r))) {
>               struct inet_diag_entry entry;
> -             struct rtattr *bc = (struct rtattr *)(r + 1);
> +             const struct nlattr *bc = nlmsg_find_attr(cb->nlh,
> +                                                       sizeof(*r),
> +                                                       
> INET_DIAG_REQ_BYTECODE);
>  
>               entry.family = tw->tw_family;
>  #if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined (CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
> @@ -547,7 +551,7 @@ static int inet_twsk_diag_dump(struct in
>               entry.dport = ntohs(tw->tw_dport);
>               entry.userlocks = 0;
>  
> -             if (!inet_diag_bc_run(RTA_DATA(bc), RTA_PAYLOAD(bc), &entry))
> +             if (!inet_diag_bc_run(nla_data(bc), nla_len(bc), &entry))
>                       return 0;
>       }
>  
> @@ -617,7 +621,7 @@ static int inet_diag_dump_reqs(struct sk
>       struct inet_diag_req *r = NLMSG_DATA(cb->nlh);
>       struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
>       struct listen_sock *lopt;
> -     struct rtattr *bc = NULL;
> +     const struct nlattr *bc = NULL;
>       struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
>       int j, s_j;
>       int reqnum, s_reqnum;
> @@ -637,8 +641,9 @@ static int inet_diag_dump_reqs(struct sk
>       if (!lopt || !lopt->qlen)
>               goto out;
>  
> -     if (cb->nlh->nlmsg_len > 4 + NLMSG_SPACE(sizeof(*r))) {
> -             bc = (struct rtattr *)(r + 1);
> +     if (nlmsg_attrlen(cb->nlh, sizeof(*r))) {
> +             bc = nlmsg_find_attr(cb->nlh, sizeof(*r),
> +                                  INET_DIAG_REQ_BYTECODE);
>               entry.sport = inet->num;
>               entry.userlocks = sk->sk_userlocks;
>       }
> @@ -671,8 +676,8 @@ static int inet_diag_dump_reqs(struct sk
>                                       &ireq->rmt_addr;
>                               entry.dport = ntohs(ireq->rmt_port);
>  
> -                             if (!inet_diag_bc_run(RTA_DATA(bc),
> -                                                 RTA_PAYLOAD(bc), &entry))
> +                             if (!inet_diag_bc_run(nla_data(bc),
> +                                                   nla_len(bc), &entry))
>                                       continue;
>                       }
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stable mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
> 

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to