From: Rajiv Andrade <[email protected]>

                   -------------------
    This is a commit scheduled for the next v2.6.34 longterm release.
    If you see a problem with using this for longterm, please comment.
                   -------------------

commit c4ff4b829ef9e6353c0b133b7adb564a68054979 upstream.

If duration variable value is 0 at this point, it's because
chip->vendor.duration wasn't filled by tpm_get_timeouts() yet.
This patch sets then the lowest timeout just to give enough
time for tpm_get_timeouts() to further succeed.

This fix avoids long boot times in case another entity attempts
to send commands to the TPM when the TPM isn't accessible.

Signed-off-by: Rajiv Andrade <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c |   10 ++++++----
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
index 068c816..6ab5381 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
@@ -354,12 +354,14 @@ unsigned long tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(struct tpm_chip 
*chip,
                    tpm_protected_ordinal_duration[ordinal &
                                                   TPM_PROTECTED_ORDINAL_MASK];
 
-       if (duration_idx != TPM_UNDEFINED)
+       if (duration_idx != TPM_UNDEFINED) {
                duration = chip->vendor.duration[duration_idx];
-       if (duration <= 0)
+               /* if duration is 0, it's because chip->vendor.duration wasn't 
*/
+               /* filled yet, so we set the lowest timeout just to give enough 
*/
+               /* time for tpm_get_timeouts() to succeed */
+               return (duration <= 0 ? HZ : duration);
+       } else
                return 2 * 60 * HZ;
-       else
-               return duration;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_calc_ordinal_duration);
 
-- 
1.7.4.4

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to