Thanks for the test, Chris.
Andrew.
We should push this into -stable.

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Chris Pearson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> That definately fixed it.  MTBF was about 20 days on those systems, since 
> that patch we've had 200 server days with no problems.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Minchan Kim wrote:
>
>>Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:16:09 +0900
>>From: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
>>To: Chris Pearson <[email protected]>
>>Cc: [email protected], Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>,
>>    Andrew Morton <[email protected]>, stable <[email protected]>
>>Subject: Re: NULL poniter dereference in isolate_lru_pages 2.6.39.1
>>
>>On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Chris Pearson
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>> We applied the patch to many servers.  No problems so far.
>>>
>>> The .config is attached.
>>
>>Thanks. I verified. The point where isolate_lru_pages + 0x225 is
>>page_count exactly. So Andrea patch solves this problem apparently.
>>Couldn't we throw this patch to stable tree?
>>
>>https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/857442/
>>
>>>
>>> What's the config option to get that debugging info in the future?
>>
>>CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO helps you. :)
>>
>>--
>>Kind regards,
>>Minchan Kim
>>
>



-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to