On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:27:56AM +0900, [email protected] wrote: > Dear Sir, > > Ricoh 1180:e823 device is named R5U220/R5U232 (2 devices have the same > device ID ). > So, I think it should be declared to as PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5U220.
Is that just the wrong name or will it actually cause misfunction? I will keep it if it's just the wrong name, but the name should be probably fixed upstream. -Andi _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
