Andi Kleen <ak <at> linux.intel.com> writes: > > > The longterm Linux kernel 2.6.35.14 is released. > > A note on the 2.6.35.13 git tags & branches: when releasing 2.6.35.13 I made > a mistake which resulted in the v2.6.35.13 tag being on a different > branch than the master tree. I decided the continue on the branch, > not the tag, so you have to delete the v2.6.35.13 tag -- if you're > using that -- and refetch the new tag. If you just use the "master" branch > or the released patches/tarballs you don't need to do anything. Sorry about that. > > This release contains security fixes and everyone using 2.6.35 is encouraged > to update. > > Thanks to all contributors. > > -Andi > > Full tarball > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm/v2.6.35/linux- 2.6.35.14.tar.gz > SHA1: 710e0fa653e8a7b60b8bd2f2698d7088a88f3187 > > Patch against 2.6.35: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm/v2.6.35/patch- 2.6.35.14.gz > SHA1: fba694a4f4d3351113c2edb8bb37cd0b4d493ddd > > Patch against 2.6.35.13 > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm/v2.6.35/incr/patch- 2.6.35.13-14.gz > SHA1: 88e53290e99ea6afa1868f35ffd0f1811ccfacca > > Full Changelog against 2.6.35.13 > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm/v2.6.35/ChangeLog- 2.6.35.14 > SHA1: f93e92f78ab7e722b0b6b1e2a5c620e0a8131c76 > > Git tree: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/longterm/linux-2.6.35.y.git > ... > _______________________________________________ > stable mailing list > stable <at> linux.kernel.org > http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable > >
Hi, Andi Thanks for your effort. When applying the increamental patch to existing 2.6.35.13 source, following errors are shown: ... patching file drivers/char/i8k.c patching file drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] n Apply anyway? [n] n Skipping patch. 3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c.rej patching file drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] n Apply anyway? [n] n Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h.rej patching file drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] n Apply anyway? [n] n Skipping patch. 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c.rej patching file drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c patching file drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c ... ... patching file net/netfilter/xt_DSCP.c patching file net/netlink/af_netlink.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] n Apply anyway? [n] n Skipping patch. 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file net/netlink/af_netlink.c.rej patching file net/packet/af_packet.c ... Shouldn't the patch be made against v2.6.35.13-original tag, not v2.6.35.13 tag? And following archive file seems to be wrong. Patch size is 0 after decompress. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm/v2.6.35/patch-v2.6.35.13- 14.gz Regards, Jongman Heo. _______________________________________________ stable mailing list stable@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
