2011/8/11 Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de>: > At Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:34:32 -0700, > Greg KH wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:52:18AM -0400, Zhang, Sonic wrote: >> > >> > >> > >-----Original Message----- >> > >From: uclinux-dist-devel-boun...@blackfin.uclinux.org >> > >[mailto:uclinux-dist-devel-boun...@blackfin.uclinux.org] On >> > >Behalf Of Scott Jiang >> > >Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 4:27 PM >> > >To: Greg Kroah-Hartman >> > >Cc: uclinux-dist-de...@blackfin.uclinux.org; >> > >alsa-de...@alsa-project.org; sta...@kernel.org >> > >Subject: [uclinux-dist-devel] [alsa-devel][PATCH 3.0]ASoC: >> > >ad193x: add spi_hw_read, fix sysclk and register definition >> > > >> > >asoc cache layer can't support this kind of spi registers, so >> > >bypass cache and read regiters directly >> > > >> > >> > This patch is against stable kernel 3.0 only, the ASOC framework in kernel >> > 3.1 and later are different. >> >> Then I need some acks from all of the relevant maintainers before I can >> apply it to the stable kernel tree. >> >> Is there a corrisponding patch in Linus's tree that does the same thing >> already? > > Not yet, even neither in sound git tree. > > We're handling the same patch now for 3.1. As the patch is likely > applicable to 3.0 as is, putting Cc to stable would be enough, I > suppose. > > > Scott, the patch to stable kernel must have been applied to the > upstream tree beforehand. Read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt. > Thanks, Takashi. I should send patch for 3.1 and cc stable tree. I have a question here that patch for 3.1 and 3.0 is different, who is responsible for the back patch?
Scott _______________________________________________ stable mailing list stable@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
