This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled ext4: call ext4_ioend_wait and ext4_flush_completed_IO in ext4_evict_inode
to the 3.0-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: ext4-call-ext4_ioend_wait-and-ext4_flush_completed_io-in.patch and it can be found in the queue-3.0 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <sta...@kernel.org> know about it. >From 2581fdc810889fdea97689cb62481201d579c796 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiaying Zhang <jiayi...@google.com> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:17:13 -0400 Subject: ext4: call ext4_ioend_wait and ext4_flush_completed_IO in ext4_evict_inode From: Jiaying Zhang <jiayi...@google.com> commit 2581fdc810889fdea97689cb62481201d579c796 upstream. Flush inode's i_completed_io_list before calling ext4_io_wait to prevent the following deadlock scenario: A page fault happens while some process is writing inode A. During page fault, shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode B. Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait() that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero. However, inode B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue. As the ext4-dio-unwritten thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to grab inode A's i_mutex lock. Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock. Also moves ext4_flush_completed_IO and ext4_ioend_wait from ext4_destroy_inode() to ext4_evict_inode(). During inode deleteion, ext4_evict_inode() is called before ext4_destroy_inode() and in ext4_evict_inode(), we may call ext4_truncate() without holding i_mutex lock. As a result, there is a race between flush_completed_IO that is called from ext4_ext_truncate() and ext4_end_io_work, which may cause corruption on an io_end structure. This change moves ext4_flush_completed_IO and ext4_ioend_wait from ext4_destroy_inode() to ext4_evict_inode() to resolve the race between ext4_truncate() and ext4_end_io_work during inode deletion. Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayi...@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <ty...@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@suse.de> --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 6 ++++++ fs/ext4/super.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -189,6 +189,12 @@ void ext4_evict_inode(struct inode *inod int err; trace_ext4_evict_inode(inode); + + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); + ext4_flush_completed_IO(inode); + mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex); + ext4_ioend_wait(inode); + if (inode->i_nlink) { truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0); goto no_delete; --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -892,7 +892,6 @@ static void ext4_i_callback(struct rcu_h static void ext4_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode) { - ext4_ioend_wait(inode); if (!list_empty(&(EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan))) { ext4_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_ERR, "Inode %lu (%p): orphan list check failed!", Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jiayi...@google.com are queue-3.0/ext4-call-ext4_ioend_wait-and-ext4_flush_completed_io-in.patch _______________________________________________ stable mailing list stable@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable