This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ext4: call ext4_ioend_wait and ext4_flush_completed_IO in ext4_evict_inode

to the 3.0-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ext4-call-ext4_ioend_wait-and-ext4_flush_completed_io-in.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.0 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <sta...@kernel.org> know about it.


>From 2581fdc810889fdea97689cb62481201d579c796 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jiaying Zhang <jiayi...@google.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:17:13 -0400
Subject: ext4: call ext4_ioend_wait and ext4_flush_completed_IO in 
ext4_evict_inode

From: Jiaying Zhang <jiayi...@google.com>

commit 2581fdc810889fdea97689cb62481201d579c796 upstream.

Flush inode's i_completed_io_list before calling ext4_io_wait to
prevent the following deadlock scenario: A page fault happens while
some process is writing inode A. During page fault,
shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode
B. Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait()
that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero. However, inode
B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the
same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue. As the ext4-dio-unwritten
thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to
grab inode A's i_mutex lock. Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is
still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock.

Also moves ext4_flush_completed_IO and ext4_ioend_wait from
ext4_destroy_inode() to ext4_evict_inode(). During inode deleteion,
ext4_evict_inode() is called before ext4_destroy_inode() and in
ext4_evict_inode(), we may call ext4_truncate() without holding
i_mutex lock. As a result, there is a race between flush_completed_IO
that is called from ext4_ext_truncate() and ext4_end_io_work, which
may cause corruption on an io_end structure. This change moves
ext4_flush_completed_IO and ext4_ioend_wait from ext4_destroy_inode()
to ext4_evict_inode() to resolve the race between ext4_truncate() and
ext4_end_io_work during inode deletion.

Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayi...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <ty...@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@suse.de>

---
 fs/ext4/inode.c |    6 ++++++
 fs/ext4/super.c |    1 -
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -189,6 +189,12 @@ void ext4_evict_inode(struct inode *inod
        int err;
 
        trace_ext4_evict_inode(inode);
+
+       mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
+       ext4_flush_completed_IO(inode);
+       mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
+       ext4_ioend_wait(inode);
+
        if (inode->i_nlink) {
                truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
                goto no_delete;
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -892,7 +892,6 @@ static void ext4_i_callback(struct rcu_h
 
 static void ext4_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
 {
-       ext4_ioend_wait(inode);
        if (!list_empty(&(EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan))) {
                ext4_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_ERR,
                         "Inode %lu (%p): orphan list check failed!",


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jiayi...@google.com are

queue-3.0/ext4-call-ext4_ioend_wait-and-ext4_flush_completed_io-in.patch

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
stable@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to