On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Greg KH <g...@kroah.com> wrote:
> Um, then why did someone mark it for the stable tree, if it wasn't going
> to be applicable there?
I thought it was simple to apply but turns out it wasn't. :-(
> It's as if you want me to waste time on it?
No, just plain mistake. The bug is indeed there in 3.2
as well, so now as I feel bad about it, here is the
proper fix:
>From b50190bc5757d5fc4d9ff180dda83157937c8685 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:22:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mach-ux500: no MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED on Snowball
MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED is not supported on Snowball SDI0 resulting in
initialization errors.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500-sdi.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500-sdi.c
b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500-sdi.c
index 6826fae..306cff0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500-sdi.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500-sdi.c
@@ -233,6 +233,8 @@ void __init snowball_sdi_init(void)
{
u32 periphid = 0x10480180;
+ /* On Snowball MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED isn't supported on sdi0 */
+ mop500_sdi0_data.capabilities &= ~MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED;
mop500_sdi2_data.capabilities |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
/* On-board eMMC */
--
1.7.7.6
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
