From: Stefan Priebe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:53:34 +0100
> So we're talking AT LEAST about these ones:
>>Linus tree :
>>
>>commit 580da35a31f91a594f3090b7a2c39b85cb051a12
>>IB: Fix RCU lockdep splats
Doesn't even come close to applying to v3.0.18
That patch would only apply properly if the IB code is using the
dst_get_neighbour() interface, which doesn't even exist in v3.0.18
>>David tree :
>>
>>commit 218fa90f072e4aeff9003d57e390857f4f35513e
>>ipv4: fix lockdep splat in rt_cache_seq_show
Patch also does not apply, and for the same reason as the IB patch.
dst_get_neighbour() doesn't exist in v3.0.18, and therefore this code
being patched doesn't make use of it.
>>commit f7e57044eeb1841847c24aa06766c8290c202583
>>sch_teql: fix lockdep splat
I'm not even going to try applying this one, it's going to have the
same issue as the previous two.
The patch mentioned by commit 218fa90f072e4aeff9003d57e390857f4f35513e
("ipv4: fix lockdep splat in rt_cache_seq_show") is not in the v3.0.x
tree, and it's a prerequisite for the rt_cache_seq_show() change
being even necessary.
In all, I think this request is invalid.
You're asking me to submit patches to -stable which don't apply
even remotely, and whose dependencies haven't even been applied
to the tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
