Why is this being sent _to_ me, rather than _cc_ ? I've never touched this driver, and know nothing about it.
Who are you expecting to apply it? They should go on the To: line of your email message. Why are you _cc_ing <[email protected]> ? Is this patch already in mainline? I can't see it there, in which case that is incorrect procedure. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt about how to submit patches for the stable kernel branches. Please try again, thanks. On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 05:17:05PM +0100, [email protected] wrote: > From: Ludovic Desroches <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <[email protected]> > Cc: stable <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c | 3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c > index 09ac13b..dfa5dd9 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c > @@ -965,11 +965,14 @@ static void atmci_start_request(struct atmel_mci *host, > host->data_status = 0; > > if (host->need_reset) { > + iflags = atmci_readl(host, ATMCI_IMR); > + iflags &= (ATMCI_SDIOIRQA | ATMCI_SDIOIRQB); > atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_CR, ATMCI_CR_SWRST); > atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_CR, ATMCI_CR_MCIEN); > atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_MR, host->mode_reg); > if (host->caps.has_cfg_reg) > atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_CFG, host->cfg_reg); > + atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_IER, iflags); > host->need_reset = false; > } > atmci_writel(host, ATMCI_SDCR, slot->sdc_reg); > -- > 1.7.5.4 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
