Am 09.02.2012 02:26, schrieb David Miller: > From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:09:35 +0100 > >> Hi, >> >> attached you find the patch files applying cleanly to 3.0.X. >> >>>> I've made my own backport of the patch and removed at least 1-2 >>>> dependencies. Anybody interested? >>>> >>> >>> If you did the work, post it for review. >> >> Thanks! > > I think you backported way too much, the ->lookup_neigh() dst ops > abstraction is unnecessary, all of the neighbour hash function > changes are also completely unnecessary. > > All you needed to backport is that bit that abstracts dst->neighbour() > behind helper routines. > > The point of this exercise is not to keep backporting changes until > the subsequent patch applies cleanly, it's to backport the minimal > amount necessary to get the effect of the patch you're ultimately > interested in adding. > > I'll work on coming up with something much more sensible tonight.
Thank you very much. As im pinted out i'm not a C dev nor a kernel hacker. So i was pretty happy that it was working. Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
