From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:53:33 +0100

> Le vendredi 10 février 2012 à 12:48 +0800, 单卫 a écrit :
>> Latest 2.6.32 stable tree(56) still has same problem. 
>> 
>> 
>> The following two commit should not be queued to 2.6.32?
>> 
>> b1faf5666438090a4dc4fceac8502edc7788b7e3
>> (net: sock_queue_err_skb() dont mess with sk_forward_alloc)
>> 
>> 2903037400a26e7c0cc93ab75a7d62abfacdf485
>> (net: fix sk_forward_alloc corruptions) 
>> 
> 
> You're right, please Greg, here is the backported patch for 2.6.32.56,
> once David agreed.
> 
> Thanks !
> 
> [PATCH] net: sock_queue_err_skb() dont mess with sk_forward_alloc)
> 
> Upstream commit b1faf5666438090a4dc4fceac8502edc7788b7e3 (2.6.35)
> 
> Depending on commit 2903037400a26e7c0cc93ab75a7d62abfacdf485
> (net: fix sk_forward_alloc corruptions) 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

Reply via email to