The patch below does not apply to the 3.2-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From 2673b4cf5d59c3ee5e0c12f6d734d38770324dc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rabin Vincent <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:17:33 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] backing-dev: fix wakeup timer races with bdi_unregister()

While 7a401a972df8e18 ("backing-dev: ensure wakeup_timer is deleted")
addressed the problem of the bdi being freed with a queued wakeup
timer, there are other races that could happen if the wakeup timer
expires after/during bdi_unregister(), before bdi_destroy() is called.

wakeup_timer_fn() could attempt to wakeup a task which has already has
been freed, or could access a NULL bdi->dev via the wake_forker_thread
tracepoint.

Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Chanho Min <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <[email protected]>

diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index 7ba8fea..dd8e2aa 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static void wakeup_timer_fn(unsigned long data)
        if (bdi->wb.task) {
                trace_writeback_wake_thread(bdi);
                wake_up_process(bdi->wb.task);
-       } else {
+       } else if (bdi->dev) {
                /*
                 * When bdi tasks are inactive for long time, they are killed.
                 * In this case we have to wake-up the forker thread which
@@ -584,6 +584,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdi_register_dev);
  */
 static void bdi_wb_shutdown(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 {
+       struct task_struct *task;
+
        if (!bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi))
                return;
 
@@ -602,8 +604,13 @@ static void bdi_wb_shutdown(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
         * Finally, kill the kernel thread. We don't need to be RCU
         * safe anymore, since the bdi is gone from visibility.
         */
-       if (bdi->wb.task)
-               kthread_stop(bdi->wb.task);
+       spin_lock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
+       task = bdi->wb.task;
+       bdi->wb.task = NULL;
+       spin_unlock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
+
+       if (task)
+               kthread_stop(task);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -623,7 +630,9 @@ static void bdi_prune_sb(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 
 void bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 {
-       if (bdi->dev) {
+       struct device *dev = bdi->dev;
+
+       if (dev) {
                bdi_set_min_ratio(bdi, 0);
                trace_writeback_bdi_unregister(bdi);
                bdi_prune_sb(bdi);
@@ -632,8 +641,12 @@ void bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
                if (!bdi_cap_flush_forker(bdi))
                        bdi_wb_shutdown(bdi);
                bdi_debug_unregister(bdi);
-               device_unregister(bdi->dev);
+
+               spin_lock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
                bdi->dev = NULL;
+               spin_unlock_bh(&bdi->wb_lock);
+
+               device_unregister(dev);
        }
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdi_unregister);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to