On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:50:02PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2012, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > I always regretted that cpusets were no done with custom node lists. > > That would have been much cleaner and also likely faster than what we have. > > Could shared memory policies ignore cpuset constraints?
Only if noone uses cpusets as a "security" mechanism, just for a "soft policy" Even with soft policy you could well break someone's setup. Maybe there are some better ways to do that now with memcg, not fully sure. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
