3.2.65-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
commit ea5d05b34aca25c066e0699512d0ffbd8ee6ac3e upstream.
If __bitmap_shift_left() or __bitmap_shift_right() are asked to shift by
a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG, they will try to shift a long value by
BITS_PER_LONG bits which is undefined. Change the functions to avoid
the undefined shift.
Coverity id: 1192175
Coverity id: 1192174
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
lib/bitmap.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/lib/bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/bitmap.c
@@ -129,7 +129,9 @@ void __bitmap_shift_right(unsigned long
lower = src[off + k];
if (left && off + k == lim - 1)
lower &= mask;
- dst[k] = upper << (BITS_PER_LONG - rem) | lower >> rem;
+ dst[k] = lower >> rem;
+ if (rem)
+ dst[k] |= upper << (BITS_PER_LONG - rem);
if (left && k == lim - 1)
dst[k] &= mask;
}
@@ -170,7 +172,9 @@ void __bitmap_shift_left(unsigned long *
upper = src[k];
if (left && k == lim - 1)
upper &= (1UL << left) - 1;
- dst[k + off] = lower >> (BITS_PER_LONG - rem) | upper << rem;
+ dst[k + off] = upper << rem;
+ if (rem)
+ dst[k + off] |= lower >> (BITS_PER_LONG - rem);
if (left && k + off == lim - 1)
dst[k + off] &= (1UL << left) - 1;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
