On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:50:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Commit df52699e4fcef ("NFSv4.1: Don't cache deviceids that have no
> notifications") causes the Linux NFS client stop caching deviceid
> unless a server pretends to support deviceid notifications.  While
> this behavior is stupid and the language around this area in rfc5661
> is a mess carified by an errata that I submittted, Trond insists
> on this behavior.  Not caching deviceids degrades block layout
> performance massively as a GETDEVICEINFO is fairly expensive.
> 
> So add this hack to make the Linux client happy again.

OK, thanks.--b.

> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c b/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
> index 03d647b..cdefaa3 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
> @@ -181,6 +181,17 @@ nfsd4_block_proc_layoutcommit(struct inode *inode,
>  }
>  
>  const struct nfsd4_layout_ops bl_layout_ops = {
> +     /*
> +      * Pretend that we send notification to the client.  This is a blatant
> +      * lie to force recent Linux clients to cache our device IDs.
> +      * We rarely ever change the device ID, so the harm of leaking deviceids
> +      * for a while isn't too bad.  Unfortunately RFC5661 is a complete mess
> +      * in this regard, but I filed errata 4119 for this a while ago, and
> +      * hopefully the Linux client will eventually start caching deviceids
> +      * without this again.
> +      */
> +     .notify_types           =
> +                     NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_DELETE | NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_CHANGE,
>       .proc_getdeviceinfo     = nfsd4_block_proc_getdeviceinfo,
>       .encode_getdeviceinfo   = nfsd4_block_encode_getdeviceinfo,
>       .proc_layoutget         = nfsd4_block_proc_layoutget,
> -- 
> 1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to