4.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Florent Fourcot <florent.four...@enst-bretagne.fr>

[ Upstream commit 21858cd02dabcf290564cbf4769b101eba54d7bb ]

commit 1d13a96c74fc ("ipv6: tcp: fix flowlabel value in ACK messages
send from TIME_WAIT") added the flow label in the last TCP packets.
Unfortunately, it was not casted properly.

This patch replace the buggy shift with be32_to_cpu/cpu_to_be32.

Fixes: 1d13a96c74fc ("ipv6: tcp: fix flowlabel value in ACK messages")
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Florent Fourcot <florent.four...@enst-bretagne.fr>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c |    2 +-
 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c      |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ void tcp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int
                        tw->tw_v6_daddr = sk->sk_v6_daddr;
                        tw->tw_v6_rcv_saddr = sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr;
                        tw->tw_tclass = np->tclass;
-                       tw->tw_flowlabel = np->flow_label >> 12;
+                       tw->tw_flowlabel = be32_to_cpu(np->flow_label & 
IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MASK);
                        tw->tw_ipv6only = sk->sk_ipv6only;
                }
 #endif
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ static void tcp_v6_timewait_ack(struct s
                        tcptw->tw_rcv_wnd >> tw->tw_rcv_wscale,
                        tcp_time_stamp + tcptw->tw_ts_offset,
                        tcptw->tw_ts_recent, tw->tw_bound_dev_if, 
tcp_twsk_md5_key(tcptw),
-                       tw->tw_tclass, (tw->tw_flowlabel << 12));
+                       tw->tw_tclass, cpu_to_be32(tw->tw_flowlabel));
 
        inet_twsk_put(tw);
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in

Reply via email to