On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:45:33AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:55:41PM -0400, Gregs git-bot wrote: > > commit: c5c4bdf02e518a281b229ae0891b346919e2d291 > > From: Sarah Sharp <[email protected]> > > Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 09:41:22 -0700 > > Subject: USB: Remove unused LPM variable. > > > > hub_initiated_lpm_disable_count is not used by any code, so remove it. > > > > This commit should be backported to kernels as old as 3.5, that contain > > the commit 8306095fd2c1100e8244c09bf560f97aca5a311d "USB: Disable USB > > 3.0 LPM in critical sections." > > > > Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > --- > > include/linux/usb.h | 1 - > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/usb.h b/include/linux/usb.h > > index d4f9de1..dea2f0d 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/usb.h > > +++ b/include/linux/usb.h > > @@ -561,7 +561,6 @@ struct usb_device { > > struct usb3_lpm_parameters u1_params; > > struct usb3_lpm_parameters u2_params; > > unsigned lpm_disable_count; > > - unsigned hub_initiated_lpm_disable_count; > > }; > > #define to_usb_device(d) container_of(d, struct usb_device, dev) > > I don't mind applying this patch, but why is it really needed for a > stable kernel release? It doesn't do anything, and I don't see any > other patches depending on it. > > Can the variable just safely live there in 3.5?
Eh, sure, if you feel it's not necessary, it's fine not to include it. Sarah Sharp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
