On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 12:11 -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > Hi, > > please consider including the following commit into 2.6.32.y, 3.0.y, > 3.2.y: > > commit 4a26620df451ad46151ad21d711ed43e963c004e > Author: Tyler Hicks <tyhi...@canonical.com> > Date: Sat Nov 5 13:45:08 2011 -0400 > > eCryptfs: Improve statfs reporting > > It fixes bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/885744, but didn't > had an Cc stable on it. > > I noted while running ecryptfs tests on stables that the test for the bug > was failing. > > The fix cherry-picks cleanly on 3.0 and 3.2. For 2.6.32, an backport is > needed, the attached backport from Ubuntu 2.6.32 should work. If 2.6.34 > or 2.6.35 are still maintained, feel free to include it too, I can > provide backported versions if needed.
This isn't a bug fix; it's a regression. pathconf(_PC_NAME_MAX) needs
to report an upper bound on the maximum name length, not a lower bound,
so that readdir_r() can be used safely.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Theory and practice are closer in theory than in practice.
- John Levine, moderator of comp.compilers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
