3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@sandisk.com>
commit f6979adeaab578f8ca14fdd32b06ddee0d9d3314 upstream.
Due to patch "libfc: Do not invoke the response handler after
fc_exch_done()" (commit ID 7030fd62) the lport_recv() call
in fc_exch_recv_req() is passed a dangling pointer. Avoid this
by moving the fc_frame_free() call from fc_invoke_resp() to its
callers. This patch fixes the following crash:
general protection fault: 0000 [#3] PREEMPT SMP
RIP: fc_lport_recv_req+0x72/0x280 [libfc]
Call Trace:
fc_exch_recv+0x642/0xde0 [libfc]
fcoe_percpu_receive_thread+0x46a/0x5ed [fcoe]
kthread+0x10a/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@sandisk.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <jbottom...@odin.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
@@ -733,8 +733,6 @@ static bool fc_invoke_resp(struct fc_exc
if (resp) {
resp(sp, fp, arg);
res = true;
- } else if (!IS_ERR(fp)) {
- fc_frame_free(fp);
}
spin_lock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
@@ -1596,7 +1594,8 @@ static void fc_exch_recv_seq_resp(struct
* If new exch resp handler is valid then call that
* first.
*/
- fc_invoke_resp(ep, sp, fp);
+ if (!fc_invoke_resp(ep, sp, fp))
+ fc_frame_free(fp);
fc_exch_release(ep);
return;
@@ -1695,7 +1694,8 @@ static void fc_exch_abts_resp(struct fc_
fc_exch_hold(ep);
if (!rc)
fc_exch_delete(ep);
- fc_invoke_resp(ep, sp, fp);
+ if (!fc_invoke_resp(ep, sp, fp))
+ fc_frame_free(fp);
if (has_rec)
fc_exch_timer_set(ep, ep->r_a_tov);
fc_exch_release(ep);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
