On 30.11.2015 14:30, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:01:36AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 01:54:22AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 22:47 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >This is wrong; see
> ><https://marc.info/?l=linux-api&m=143144321020852&w=2>.
>
>Damned, and I now remember this discussion. The worst thing is that
>I purposely booted a machine to test the fix and was happy with it,
>I forgot this point:-(
>
> >For 2.6.32 perhaps you could retain the capability check at open time
> >but store the result in private state for use at read time.
>
>I'll see if it is possible to opencode security_capable() with 2.6.32's
>infrastructure, and how far this brings us. Or maybe we should even drop
>this one completely and leave pagemap readable only for superuser on
>2.6.32, it doesn't seem to be that big of a deal either.
It was easy enough to open-code security_capable() in the end. I've
tested this version which works fine for me here. If that's OK for you
I'll emit an -rc2 with the last two patches.

Thanks,
Willy


0001-pagemap-hide-physical-addresses-from-non-privileged-.patch


 From fde24678af1b04712144457512afbc16fd71b252 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov<[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:00:07 -0700
Subject: pagemap: hide physical addresses from non-privileged users

commit 1c90308e7a77af6742a97d1021cca923b23b7f0d upstream.

This patch makes pagemap readable for normal users and hides physical
addresses from them.  For some use-cases PFN isn't required at all.

Seehttp://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Fixes: ab676b7d6fbf ("pagemap: do not leak physical addresses to non-privileged 
userspace")
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov<[email protected]>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi<[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mark Williamson<[email protected]>
Tested-by:  Mark Williamson<[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton<[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds<[email protected]>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
  - Add the same check in the places where we look up a PFN
  - Add struct pagemapread * parameters where necessary
  - Open-code file_ns_capable()
  - Delete pagemap_open() entirely, as it would always return 0]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings<[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit b1fb185f26e85f76e3ac6ce557398d78797c9684)
[wt: adjusted context, no pagemap_hugetlb_range() in 2.6.32, open-coded
  security_capable(). Tested OK. ]
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau<[email protected]>
---
  fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 73db5a6..24d3602 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
  #include <linux/mempolicy.h>
  #include <linux/swap.h>
  #include <linux/swapops.h>
+#include <linux/security.h>

  #include <asm/elf.h>
  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -539,6 +540,7 @@ const struct file_operations proc_clear_refs_operations = {

  struct pagemapread {
        u64 __user *out, *end;
+       bool show_pfn;
  };

  #define PM_ENTRY_BYTES      sizeof(u64)
@@ -589,14 +591,14 @@ static u64 swap_pte_to_pagemap_entry(pte_t pte)
        return swp_type(e) | (swp_offset(e) << MAX_SWAPFILES_SHIFT);
  }

-static u64 pte_to_pagemap_entry(pte_t pte)
+static u64 pte_to_pagemap_entry(struct pagemapread *pm, pte_t pte)
  {
        u64 pme = 0;
        if (is_swap_pte(pte))
                pme = PM_PFRAME(swap_pte_to_pagemap_entry(pte))
                        | PM_PSHIFT(PAGE_SHIFT) | PM_SWAP;
        else if (pte_present(pte))
-               pme = PM_PFRAME(pte_pfn(pte))
+               pme = (pm->show_pfn ? PM_PFRAME(pte_pfn(pte)) : 0)
                        | PM_PSHIFT(PAGE_SHIFT) | PM_PRESENT;
        return pme;
  }
@@ -624,7 +626,7 @@ static int pagemap_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long 
addr, unsigned long end,
                if (vma && (vma->vm_start <= addr) &&
                    !is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
                        pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
-                       pfn = pte_to_pagemap_entry(*pte);
+                       pfn = pte_to_pagemap_entry(pm, *pte);
                        /* unmap before userspace copy */
                        pte_unmap(pte);
                }
@@ -695,6 +697,9 @@ static ssize_t pagemap_read(struct file *file, char __user 
*buf,
        if (!count)
                goto out_task;

+       /* do not disclose physical addresses: attack vector */
+       pm.show_pfn = !cap_capable(current, file->f_cred, CAP_SYS_ADMIN, 
SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT);
+

At first sight this is confusing... but correct. It really returns zero
for success, unlike to new file_ns_capable which returns bool true.

The rest looks good too.

        mm = get_task_mm(task);
        if (!mm)
                goto out_task;
@@ -773,19 +778,9 @@ out:
        return ret;
  }

-static int pagemap_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-{
-       /* do not disclose physical addresses to unprivileged
-          userspace (closes a rowhammer attack vector) */
-       if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
-               return -EPERM;
-       return 0;
-}
-
  const struct file_operations proc_pagemap_operations = {
        .llseek         = mem_lseek, /* borrow this */
        .read           = pagemap_read,
-       .open           = pagemap_open,
  };
  #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_PAGE_MONITOR */

-- 1.7.12.1



--
Konstantin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to