On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 01:45:27PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> cmci_rediscover() is only called by the CPU_POST_DEAD event handler,
> which means the corresponding cpu has already dead. As a result, it
> won't be accessed in the for_each_online_cpu loop.
> So, we could change the if(cpu == dying) statement into a WARN_ON_ONCE().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c 
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> index 38e49bc..481d152 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> @@ -180,8 +180,8 @@ void cmci_rediscover(int dying)
>       cpumask_copy(old, &current->cpus_allowed);
>  
>       for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> -             if (cpu == dying)
> -                     continue;
> +             WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu == dying);

Ok, I don't understand that:

we want to warn that the rediscovering is happening on a dying cpu?? And
before that, we simply jumped over it and didn't do the rediscovering
there? Why should we warn at all?

Huh?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to