This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ext4: Checksum the block bitmap properly with bigalloc enabled

to the 3.6-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ext4-checksum-the-block-bitmap-properly-with-bigalloc-enabled.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.6 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 79f1ba49569e5aec919b653c55b03274c2331701 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tao Ma <boyu...@taobao.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:34:32 -0400
Subject: ext4: Checksum the block bitmap properly with bigalloc enabled

From: Tao Ma <boyu...@taobao.com>

commit 79f1ba49569e5aec919b653c55b03274c2331701 upstream.

In mke2fs, we only checksum the whole bitmap block and it is right.
While in the kernel, we use EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP to indicate the
size of the checksumed bitmap which is wrong when we enable bigalloc.
The right size should be EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP and this patch fixes
it.

Also as every caller of ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set and
ext4_block_bitmap_csum_verify pass in EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)/8,
we'd better removes this parameter and sets it in the function itself.

Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu...@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <ty...@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczer...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ext4/balloc.c  |    8 +++-----
 fs/ext4/bitmap.c  |    6 ++++--
 fs/ext4/ext4.h    |    4 ++--
 fs/ext4/ialloc.c  |    4 +---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c |    9 +++------
 fs/ext4/resize.c  |    3 +--
 6 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -174,8 +174,7 @@ void ext4_init_block_bitmap(struct super
                ext4_free_inodes_set(sb, gdp, 0);
                ext4_itable_unused_set(sb, gdp, 0);
                memset(bh->b_data, 0xff, sb->s_blocksize);
-               ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, block_group, gdp, bh,
-                                          EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8);
+               ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, block_group, gdp, bh);
                return;
        }
        memset(bh->b_data, 0, sb->s_blocksize);
@@ -212,8 +211,7 @@ void ext4_init_block_bitmap(struct super
         */
        ext4_mark_bitmap_end(num_clusters_in_group(sb, block_group),
                             sb->s_blocksize * 8, bh->b_data);
-       ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, block_group, gdp, bh,
-                                  EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8);
+       ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, block_group, gdp, bh);
        ext4_group_desc_csum_set(sb, block_group, gdp);
 }
 
@@ -350,7 +348,7 @@ void ext4_validate_block_bitmap(struct s
                return;
        }
        if (unlikely(!ext4_block_bitmap_csum_verify(sb, block_group,
-                       desc, bh, EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8))) {
+                       desc, bh))) {
                ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);
                ext4_error(sb, "bg %u: bad block bitmap checksum", block_group);
                return;
--- a/fs/ext4/bitmap.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/bitmap.c
@@ -58,11 +58,12 @@ void ext4_inode_bitmap_csum_set(struct s
 
 int ext4_block_bitmap_csum_verify(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group,
                                  struct ext4_group_desc *gdp,
-                                 struct buffer_head *bh, int sz)
+                                 struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
        __u32 hi;
        __u32 provided, calculated;
        struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
+       int sz = EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8;
 
        if (!EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
                                        EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM))
@@ -84,8 +85,9 @@ int ext4_block_bitmap_csum_verify(struct
 
 void ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group,
                                struct ext4_group_desc *gdp,
-                               struct buffer_head *bh, int sz)
+                               struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
+       int sz = EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8;
        __u32 csum;
        struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
 
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1867,10 +1867,10 @@ int ext4_inode_bitmap_csum_verify(struct
                                  struct buffer_head *bh, int sz);
 void ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group,
                                struct ext4_group_desc *gdp,
-                               struct buffer_head *bh, int sz);
+                               struct buffer_head *bh);
 int ext4_block_bitmap_csum_verify(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group,
                                  struct ext4_group_desc *gdp,
-                                 struct buffer_head *bh, int sz);
+                                 struct buffer_head *bh);
 
 /* balloc.c */
 extern void ext4_validate_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
--- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
@@ -753,9 +753,7 @@ got:
                        ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp,
                                ext4_free_clusters_after_init(sb, group, gdp));
                        ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, group, gdp,
-                                                  block_bitmap_bh,
-                                                  EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) /
-                                                  8);
+                                                  block_bitmap_bh);
                        ext4_group_desc_csum_set(sb, group, gdp);
                }
                ext4_unlock_group(sb, group);
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -2804,8 +2804,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_
        }
        len = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) - ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len;
        ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp, len);
-       ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group, gdp, bitmap_bh,
-                                  EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8);
+       ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group, gdp, bitmap_bh);
        ext4_group_desc_csum_set(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group, gdp);
 
        ext4_unlock_group(sb, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group);
@@ -4664,8 +4663,7 @@ do_more:
 
        ret = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) + count_clusters;
        ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp, ret);
-       ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, block_group, gdp, bitmap_bh,
-                                  EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8);
+       ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, block_group, gdp, bitmap_bh);
        ext4_group_desc_csum_set(sb, block_group, gdp);
        ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);
        percpu_counter_add(&sbi->s_freeclusters_counter, count_clusters);
@@ -4809,8 +4807,7 @@ int ext4_group_add_blocks(handle_t *hand
        mb_free_blocks(NULL, &e4b, bit, count);
        blk_free_count = blocks_freed + ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, desc);
        ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, desc, blk_free_count);
-       ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, block_group, desc, bitmap_bh,
-                                  EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8);
+       ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, block_group, desc, bitmap_bh);
        ext4_group_desc_csum_set(sb, block_group, desc);
        ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);
        percpu_counter_add(&sbi->s_freeclusters_counter,
--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -1121,8 +1121,7 @@ static int ext4_set_bitmap_checksums(str
        bh = ext4_get_bitmap(sb, group_data->block_bitmap);
        if (!bh)
                return -EIO;
-       ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, group, gdp, bh,
-                                  EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8);
+       ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, group, gdp, bh);
        brelse(bh);
 
        return 0;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from boyu...@taobao.com are

queue-3.6/ext4-checksum-the-block-bitmap-properly-with-bigalloc-enabled.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to