Why does the patch below meet the Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt guidelines? What is it hurting to have this included twice?
thanks, greg k-h On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:35:21AM -0400, Gregs git-bot wrote: > commit: c2103b7ef7ecb4d17138b6ced4aad1b576affc4e > From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn> > Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 22:06:47 +0800 > Subject: xen/x86: remove duplicated include from enlighten.c > > Remove duplicated include. > > dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch. > (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch) > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> > --- > arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 -- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > index 4466feb..783522b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > @@ -81,8 +81,6 @@ > #include "smp.h" > #include "multicalls.h" > > -#include <xen/events.h> > - > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hypercall_page); > > DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vcpu_info *, xen_vcpu); > -- > 1.7.3.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
