On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 12:33:47AM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > Hi Greg, > > At Sat, 1 Dec 2012 11:57:13 -0200, > Peter Senna Tschudin wrote: > > > > 3.6.9-rc1 compile and run successfully under Fedora 17 > > > > [peter@ace ~]$ uname -a;systemd-analyze > > Linux ace.home 3.6.9-rc1+ #3 SMP Sat Dec 1 11:45:16 BRST 2012 x86_64 > > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Startup finished in 1312ms (kernel) + 2764ms (userspace) = 4077ms > > > > > > P.S. What would be the correct subject for this E-mail?
Something that might have the version number in it? > I also want to know about it. Which way is preferable? > > - Reply to each Greg's "x.y.z review" mail. > > # I followed this way for 3.0.54-rc1, 3.4.21-rc1, and 3.6.9-rc1 (the > latest ones). > > - Compound multiple -rc test result and report it by one mail like Peter's > one. > > # I followed this way for 3.0.53-rc1, 3.4.20-rc1, and 3.6.8-rc1 since I > tested > # these kernels before announcing stable kernel review. > > - Don't care. Any way is OK I really don't care, any way is ok. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
