On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 11:43 -0800, Bing Zhao wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> > 3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > 
> > ------------------
> > 
> > From: Avinash Patil <pat...@marvell.com>
> > 
> > commit bbea3bc432dc5c08d09ca5c80afdd82515470688 upstream.
> 
> This patch is not for stable kernel.
[...]

Right, I've managed to pick up 3 changes to mwifiex that it looks like I
shouldn't have included.  Firstly:

9c969d8ccb1e mwifiex: check wait_event_interruptible return value

This had "3.6+" to the left of <stable@vger.kernel.org>, whereas I
expect version qualifiers to be on the right.  So my import script just
put this in the queue without asking me to interpret the version
qualifier.  (I don't automate *that* because people use too wide a
variety of syntaxes.)

When trying to apply that, I found that it seemed to depend on these
two:

bbea3bc432dc mwifiex: wakeup and stop multiple tx queues in net_device
b7097eb75fa1 mwifiex: handle association failure case correctly

which also looked like they were important fixes.  Presumably I should
drop all of those?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
                                                           - Albert Einstein

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to