On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 18:45 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: [...] > Your review is appreciate, however there was 4 more version sent > since this one. And this issue was already pointed and then fixed > in the 3rd version.
Yes, sorry about that - I'm some way behind on reading the stable list. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Quantity is no substitute for quality, but it's the only one we've got.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
