GFP_ATOMIC is not a single gfp flag, but a macro which expands to the other
flags and LACK of __GFP_WAIT flag. To check if caller wanted to perform an
atomic allocation, the code must test __GFP_WAIT flag presence. This patch
fixes the issue introduced in v3.6-rc5

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index f61a570..5fe4d72 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ static void *arm_iommu_alloc_attrs(struct device *dev, 
size_t size,
        *handle = DMA_ERROR_CODE;
        size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
 
-       if (gfp & GFP_ATOMIC)
+       if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
                return __iommu_alloc_atomic(dev, size, handle);
 
        /*
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to