This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    drm/radeon: fix CP semaphores on CIK

to the 3.13-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     drm-radeon-fix-cp-semaphores-on-cik.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.13 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.


>From 8f53492f86f9ca66bc762be98f0a9fce9bcb319a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian König <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:37:20 +0100
Subject: drm/radeon: fix CP semaphores on CIK
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

From: Christian König <[email protected]>

commit 8f53492f86f9ca66bc762be98f0a9fce9bcb319a upstream.

The CP semaphore queue on CIK has a bug that triggers if uncompleted
waits use the same address while a signal is still pending. Work around
this by using different addresses for each sync.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h           |    4 +++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c      |    2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_semaphore.c |   19 ++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ extern int radeon_runtime_pm;
 /* R600+ */
 #define R600_RING_TYPE_UVD_INDEX       5
 
+/* number of hw syncs before falling back on blocking */
+#define RADEON_NUM_SYNCS                       4
+
 /* hardcode those limit for now */
 #define RADEON_VA_IB_OFFSET                    (1 << 20)
 #define RADEON_VA_RESERVED_SIZE                        (8 << 20)
@@ -544,7 +547,6 @@ int radeon_mode_dumb_mmap(struct drm_fil
 /*
  * Semaphores.
  */
-/* everything here is constant */
 struct radeon_semaphore {
        struct radeon_sa_bo             *sa_bo;
        signed                          waiters;
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ int radeon_ib_schedule(struct radeon_dev
        }
 
        /* 64 dwords should be enough for fence too */
-       r = radeon_ring_lock(rdev, ring, 64 + RADEON_NUM_RINGS * 8);
+       r = radeon_ring_lock(rdev, ring, 64 + RADEON_NUM_SYNCS * 8);
        if (r) {
                dev_err(rdev->dev, "scheduling IB failed (%d).\n", r);
                return r;
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_semaphore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_semaphore.c
@@ -34,14 +34,15 @@
 int radeon_semaphore_create(struct radeon_device *rdev,
                            struct radeon_semaphore **semaphore)
 {
+       uint32_t *cpu_addr;
        int i, r;
 
        *semaphore = kmalloc(sizeof(struct radeon_semaphore), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (*semaphore == NULL) {
                return -ENOMEM;
        }
-       r = radeon_sa_bo_new(rdev, &rdev->ring_tmp_bo,
-                            &(*semaphore)->sa_bo, 8, 8, true);
+       r = radeon_sa_bo_new(rdev, &rdev->ring_tmp_bo, &(*semaphore)->sa_bo,
+                            8 * RADEON_NUM_SYNCS, 8, true);
        if (r) {
                kfree(*semaphore);
                *semaphore = NULL;
@@ -49,7 +50,10 @@ int radeon_semaphore_create(struct radeo
        }
        (*semaphore)->waiters = 0;
        (*semaphore)->gpu_addr = radeon_sa_bo_gpu_addr((*semaphore)->sa_bo);
-       *((uint64_t*)radeon_sa_bo_cpu_addr((*semaphore)->sa_bo)) = 0;
+
+       cpu_addr = radeon_sa_bo_cpu_addr((*semaphore)->sa_bo);
+       for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_SYNCS; ++i)
+               cpu_addr[i] = 0;
 
        for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i)
                (*semaphore)->sync_to[i] = NULL;
@@ -125,6 +129,7 @@ int radeon_semaphore_sync_rings(struct r
                                struct radeon_semaphore *semaphore,
                                int ring)
 {
+       unsigned count = 0;
        int i, r;
 
         for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i) {
@@ -140,6 +145,12 @@ int radeon_semaphore_sync_rings(struct r
                        return -EINVAL;
                }
 
+               if (++count > RADEON_NUM_SYNCS) {
+                       /* not enough room, wait manually */
+                       radeon_fence_wait_locked(fence);
+                       continue;
+               }
+
                /* allocate enough space for sync command */
                r = radeon_ring_alloc(rdev, &rdev->ring[i], 16);
                if (r) {
@@ -164,6 +175,8 @@ int radeon_semaphore_sync_rings(struct r
 
                radeon_ring_commit(rdev, &rdev->ring[i]);
                radeon_fence_note_sync(fence, ring);
+
+               semaphore->gpu_addr += 8;
        }
 
        return 0;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] 
are

queue-3.13/drm-radeon-fix-cp-semaphores-on-cik.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to