3.11.10.11 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
------------------
From: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
commit 5f5092e72cc25a6a5785308270e0085b2b2772cc upstream.
Since we indirect all of our PMU IRQ handling through a dispatcher, it's
trivial to hook up perf_sample_event_took to prevent applications such
as oprofile from generating interrupt storms due to an unrealisticly
low sample period.
Reported-by: Robert Richter <r...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Cc: Weng Meiling <wengmeiling.w...@huawei.com>
[ luis: backported to 3.11: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriq...@canonical.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index e186ee1e63f6..de5cd767e4df 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -303,11 +303,18 @@ static irqreturn_t armpmu_dispatch_irq(int irq, void *dev)
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = (struct arm_pmu *) dev;
struct platform_device *plat_device = armpmu->plat_device;
struct arm_pmu_platdata *plat = dev_get_platdata(&plat_device->dev);
+ int ret;
+ u64 start_clock, finish_clock;
+ start_clock = sched_clock();
if (plat && plat->handle_irq)
- return plat->handle_irq(irq, dev, armpmu->handle_irq);
+ ret = plat->handle_irq(irq, dev, armpmu->handle_irq);
else
- return armpmu->handle_irq(irq, dev);
+ ret = armpmu->handle_irq(irq, dev);
+ finish_clock = sched_clock();
+
+ perf_sample_event_took(finish_clock - start_clock);
+ return ret;
}
static void
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
