On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 10:13:55AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 08:24:17AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 04:16:20PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:14:04AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > <...>
> > > > @@ -188,17 +193,21 @@ static void note_page(struct seq_file *m
> > > >                 /*
> > > >                  * Now print the actual finished series
> > > >                  */
> > > > -               seq_printf(m, "0x%0*lx-0x%0*lx   ",
> > > > -                          width, st->start_address,
> > > > -                          width, st->current_address);
> > > > -
> > > > -               delta = (st->current_address - st->start_address) >> 10;
> > > > -               while (!(delta & 1023) && unit[1]) {
> > > > -                       delta >>= 10;
> > > > -                       unit++;
> > > > +               if (!st->marker->max_lines ||
> > > > +                   st->lines < st->marker->max_lines) {
> > > > +                       seq_printf(m, "0x%0*lx-0x%0*lx   ",
> > > > +                                  width, st->start_address,
> > > > +                                  width, st->current_address);
> > > > +
> > > > +                       delta = (st->current_address - 
> > > > st->start_address) >> 10;
> > > > +                       while (!(delta & 1023) && unit[1]) {
> > > > +                               delta >>= 10;
> > > > +                               unit++;
> > > > +                       }
> > > > +                       seq_printf(m, "%9lu%c ", delta, *unit);
> > > > +                       printk_prot(m, st->current_prot, st->level);
> > > >                 }
> > > > -               seq_printf(m, "%9lu%c ", delta, *unit);
> > > > -               printk_prot(m, st->current_prot, st->level);
> > > > +               st->lines++;
> > > >  
> > > >                 /*
> > > >                  * We print markers for special areas of address space,
> > > 
> > > Hmm... the original commit has a 2nd hunk here that does seem to be
> > > applicable to 3.10.  Was this dropped accidentally or on purpose?
> > 
> > I don't remember at all, sorry.  What is the hunk that I missed?
> 
> You are right, I somehow missed that, thanks.  I've also now fixed up
> the ">> 10" change as well.  Good thing this is just in debugging code
> :)

And I messed it up on the 3.4 patch as well, so I'll go fix that one up
too...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to