[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-3?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12983699#action_12983699
 ] 

Enrico Daga commented on STANBOL-3:
-----------------------------------

I also would vote for 3 or 2. The main point is that it must be a stable one 
and it should not change more then 1 time :)

> Clearly defined Stanbol vocabularies
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STANBOL-3
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-3
>             Project: Stanbol
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Enrico Daga
>
> The Stanbol software uses some RDF vocabularies with an active role in the 
> code (the code refer to these vocabularies).
> For instance, FISE uses a vocabolary for Enhancement description, KReS uses a 
> vocabulary for managing ontologies and rules.
> Stanbol vocabularies should:
> - be refactored when moving to stanbol using some common namespace
> - be distributed in a well-formed RDF (which means also well-documented)
> - be collected and versioned in a common svn branch (separated from the one 
> of the software code)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to