[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058558#comment-13058558
]
Enrico Daga commented on STANBOL-247:
-------------------------------------
I think this issue shuld be riformulated, and split in three.
For example fo the first sentence:
- It is not clear from the technical point of view which is the problem of null
sessions (which component? What happen if session is null? "What" is null? The
object is null? The session do not exist?)
Another example: how this relates to SSL?
Please clarify and maybe edit the title or create new issues.
Thanks!
> More robust OntoNet session management
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: STANBOL-247
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-247
> Project: Stanbol
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: KReS
> Reporter: Alessandro Adamou
> Assignee: Alessandro Adamou
> Priority: Minor
>
> Session CRUD methods should be synchronized and resistant to null sessions.
> RESTful API should encompass the whole session lifecycle management. Also,
> destructive operations over SSL should be considered.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
